• Today in Labor History
    September 18, 1999: A 20-month illegal lockout of 2,900 Steelworkers members at Kaiser Aluminum plants in three states ends when an arbitrator orders a new contract. Kaiser was forced to firescabs and fork over tens of millions of dollars in back pay to union members.
    ~ Union Communications Services

    General Membership Meetings
    Our union meetings are held every third Thursday of the month at the union hall, 6000 Erdman Ave. Baltimore, MD 21205. Start time is 5 p.m. Please be present and on time. (And bring a coworker.)

      Teamster News Headlines  
     
    Minnesota Labor Joins Together to Picket Center of American Experiment Event Celebrating Janus Decision
    Read the Latest Edition of the Drive Up Standards Newletter!
    Listen To The UPS Freight Members Teleforum From Sept. 9
    Tentative UPS Agreement Increases Full-Time Package Car Driver Progressions
    WCCUSD Teamster Wins Backpay in Grievance Settlement
    More Efficient Teamsters Disaster Relief Fund Program
    Hurricane Safety Information from OSHA
    Part-Time UPS Teamsters Teleforum Call - September 8
    Tentative National UPS Agreement Provides Improvements to Feeder Drivers
    Apple Bus Workers Join Teamsters Local 955
     
         
  • Fair Treatment
    Updated On: Mar 03, 2015

    Your Right to Fair Treatment

    Your Teamsters collective bargaining agreement provides you with the right to fair treatment at work. Without your union contract, you would be employed “at will” which means that the employer could issue discipline or terminate your employment for any non-discriminatory reason, or for no reason.

    The “just cause” provision in your contract protects you against unreasonable discipline. The basic elements of just cause have been reduced to seven tests. A "no" answer to one or more of the questions below means that just cause either was not satisfied or at least was seriously weakened.

    1. Notice: "Did the Employer give to the employee forewarning or foreknowledge of the possible consequences of the employee's disciplinary conduct?"

    2. Reasonable rule or order: "Was the Employer's rule or managerial order reasonably related to (a) the orderly, efficient, and safe operation of the Employer's business, and (b) the performance that the Employer might properly expect of the Employee?"

    3. Investigation: "Did the Employer, before administering the discipline to an employee, make an effort to discover whether the employee did in fact violate or disobey a rule or order of management?"

    4. Fair investigation: "Was the Employer's investigation conducted fairly and objectively?"

    5. Proof: "At the investigation, did the 'judge' obtain substantial evidence or proof that the employee was guilty as charged?"

    6. Equal treatment: "Has the Employer applied its rules, orders and penalties even-handedly and without discrimination to all employees?"

    7. Penalty: "Was the degree of discipline administered by the Employer in a particular case reasonably related to (a) the seriousness of the employee's proven offense, and (b) the record of the employee in his service with the Employer?"


  • Teamsters Local 888

    Copyright © 2018.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive

    106657 hits since Mar 02, 2015


  • Top of Page image